Belief, Fiction or Myth, Ideology, Moral Issue, Question, Reaction, Religion, Religious Criticism

Perfect Hypocrisy: De Romani Pontificis Infallibili Magisterio [RAW]

WARNING: Before you read this post, if you are a Christian or a believer of any deity, before you react violently or criticize, please read the post with an open-mind and broad understanding. And then try to analyze the writing.

Pastor Aeternus in Vatican Council I

 Pastor Aeternus is an incipient of the Dogmatic Constitution made by the Vatican Council I in July 18,1870, which defines and justifies as follows:

  • Apostolic Primacy conferred to Peter.
  • Perpetuity of the Petrine Primacy in the Roman Pontiff.
  • Gives meaning and power of Papal Primacy.
  • Defines and declares Infallible Teaching authority of the Roman Pontiff.

 First Vatican Council

First Vatican Council

De Romani Pontificis Infallibili Magisterio

Papal infallibility, is a centuries issue within and outside the Catholic Church, where in, through the power of the Holy Spirit, a Pope is preserved from even a possibility of error. As a conclusion of the 4th chapter of Dogmatic Constitution in Pastor Aeternus, which declare the infallibility of the Pope by Bishop Edward Fritzgerald and Bishop Aloisio Riccio:

“We teach and define that, it is a dogma divinely revealed that the Roman Pontiff, when he speaks Ex Cathedra, that is when in discharge of the Office of the Pastor and Doctor of all Christians, by virtue  of his Supreme Apostolic authority, he defines a doctrine regarding faith and morals to be held by the Universal Church, by the divine assistance promise to him in blessed Peter, is possessed of the infallibility with which the Divine Redeemer willed that his Church should be endowed in defining doctrines regarding faith and morals, and that, therefore such definitions of the Roman Pontiff are of themselves and not from the consent of the church irreformable.

So then, should anyone, which God forbid, have the temerity to reject this definition of ours: let him be Anathema.” – Vatican Council I, sess. IV, const. De Ecclesia Christi, ch. IV

And due to the dogmatic definition of a truth about this Papal Magisterium, all Papal teachings from 1870 proclamation can, if meet the criteria set out in dogmatic definition, will be considered infallible. Yet, the tradition of Papal Infallibility goes farther before was officially codified, as what Pope Gregory VIII states regarding the powers of the Papacy in Dictatus Papae, circa 1075: “22. That the Roman Church has never erred; nor will it err to all eternity, the Scripture bearing the witness.“. And in 1917 manual of Code of Cannon Law, distributed to all Catholic Bishops and Clergy around the world, there is an additional line where in “Papal Letters to the faithful would be regarded as infallible in practice if not in principle“.

The main objective why Papal Infallibility was defined and codified is to; 1. silent the minorities of the Church and those who opposes the Papal teachings and 2. to assert the Bishop of Rome as the head of the College of Cardinals.

But as factual truths are emerging by the works of Science, the infallible teachings of the Church had now been challenged. One such example is the Galileo Affair, around 1610 – 1633, where in Galileo Galilei came into conflict with the Church. Because the Church believed that our world is the center of the universe and rather the Earth revolves around the sun, it is the sun that revolves around the Earth, as what the Scriptures propose. And because of that, Galileo Galilei was convicted of heresy. But in October 31, 1992, the then pope, John Paul II expressed regrets on how the Galileo Affair was handled, then he issued a declaration acknowledging the errors committed by the Church that judged the scientific position of Galileo. And in year 2000, 367 years after the Catholic Church convicted Galileo of heresy, Pope John Paul II, issued a formal apology for the mistakes committed by the Church in the trial of Galileo. Then in December 2008, during the event to mark the 400th anniversary of Galileo’s earliest telescopic  observation, Pope Benedict XVI, applaud Galileo’s contribution to science as an Astronomer.

And there are more teachings considered ancients due to its time origin, mostly taught by the Church Fathers and Doctors of the Church which we’re either considered as official or un-official infallible that are now challenged by Science and the modern society such as: The Assumption of Mary, The Creation of the World, the First Parents, Bible Infallibility and also moral teachings like the controversial Reproductive health, euthanasia and death penalty.

And in the course of time, we now see that the infallibility of the Pope is now questioned, and this Papal Infallibility is just another hoax, truly made out of desperation of the church leaders to assert its power and control to the world especially to the advancing scientific thought, claiming falsely that the Pope cannot be erred. But as we see, they erred… So, where is there infallibility then?

References:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pastor_aeternus

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictatus_papae

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_infallibility

www.catholic.com/library/Papal_Infallibility.asp

www.evangelicaloutreach.org/papal.htm

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/441822/papal-infallibility

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assumption_of_Mary

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Vatican_Council

Advertisements

About Darc xeD

Sometimes its good to write a lil' story about your life, for it's about sharing the experience you have to the world.

Discussion

4 thoughts on “Perfect Hypocrisy: De Romani Pontificis Infallibili Magisterio [RAW]

  1. so what is your point here? if your not a catholic then it’s not your concern. You’re such a great idiot and moron!

    Posted by Gilbert Ilagan | July 10, 2011, 12:32 PM
    • my point? that papal infallibility is just a hoax made by your power-hungry church leaders!
      yeah, it doesnt concerns me, but as a human,it is my duty to fellow humans to expose this hoax and stop your church in making man as fools, idiots and morons like you!
      youre the perfect example of idiot and moron by making name-calling to the author than try to refute the article. unless you really cant refute this one.. lolz!

      Posted by Darc xeD | July 12, 2011, 9:47 AM
  2. This proves that the pope is just a mere mortal and no special powers.

    Posted by Mr. Anderson | May 31, 2011, 3:53 AM
  3. The Catholics will probably defend their Pope on this one.

    Posted by Call me Chris | May 25, 2011, 8:20 AM

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

..and I Quote

quotes Darc likes


"Sometimes, it's good to write a lil' story about your life, for it's about sharing the experience you have to the world." - Frederick Bolastig
Follow dextrerium on Twitter
The Professional Heckler

"The problem with political jokes is they get elected.**"

The Laker Hoop Gang

(haters welcome)

One Furious Llama

Do you know reason? Let me show you it.

The Road

Life is about the ride, not the destination

Hackaday

Fresh hacks every day

Harry Roque's Blog

Thoughts of an activist lawyer

Shark Attack Watch

Reported shark attacks around the World.

talinorfali

Don't ever change yourself to impress someone, cause they should be impressed that you don't change to please others -- When you are going through something hard and wonder where God is, always remember that the teacher is always quiet during a test --- Unknown

Brooke's Faces Of Life

Life is a continous adventure, learning and hoping

The Atheist Freedom Wall

The garden is beautiful. No need for fairies.

%d bloggers like this: